fix(settings): retry a failed revert of a refused lock removal and fail closed meanwhile

When writing the previous store back after a relock-refused removal
fails, the lock store now keeps a pending rewrite, is not readable (the
locked session withholds everything) and rewrites the persisted store
from memory on the next access, so a restart cannot load the removal.
A failed "Remove all playlists" clear shares the same retry.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
4grayandClaude Opus 5.5 committed 2026-09-27 13:53:09 +02:00
1 parent c4754a7aa4
commit 9bbeff32a3
4 files changed
+91 -29

No files matched your search

+6 -2
View File
@@ -420,6 +420,10 @@ by the index alone:
durable commit points: right after the store write (a refusal writes the
previous store back) and, for Xtream, after the index stamps (a refusal
rolls back like a failed stamp), before the revision is published.
If writing the previous store back fails, the persisted copy may carry
the removal while memory does not: the store stays not `readable`
(fail-closed) and is rewritten from memory on the next store access, as
a failed "Remove all playlists" clear is.
Adding locks is always allowed.
Playlist deletion and "Remove all playlists" are not edits and are not
gated.
@@ -445,8 +449,8 @@ the store through the `PLAYLIST_DELETE_CLEANUP` hook
re-stamp, the category rows go with the playlist), and "Remove all
playlists" empties it through `ParentalLockService.clearAllLocks` once the
deletion has succeeded — the in-memory store empties at once, and a failed
persisted clear is retried on the next store access and overwritten by the
next write. A backup restore that CREATES a playlist (not a merge) starts
persisted clear is retried on the next store access (the store is not
`readable` until it lands). A backup restore that CREATES a playlist (not a merge) starts
that playlist from empty locks, so a reused id can never inherit entries a
failed cleanup left behind; the restore retries a failed lock-store read
first (`ensureLocksReadable`) and aborts while it still fails, so that check
@@ -494,6 +494,36 @@ describe('ParentalLockLockStore', () => {
});
});
it('fails closed and retries when the revert of a refused removal cannot be written', async () => {
storage.readLocks.mockResolvedValue({
'pl-1': { xtream: [], stalker: [], m3u: ['Adults'] },
});
await store.load();
await store.ensureReadable();
let unlocked = true;
store.setRemovalGate(() => unlocked);
jest.spyOn(console, 'warn').mockImplementation(() => undefined);
jest.spyOn(console, 'error').mockImplementation(() => undefined);
storage.writeLocks
.mockImplementationOnce(async () => {
unlocked = false; // relock while the removal is written
return true;
})
.mockResolvedValueOnce(false) // the revert
.mockResolvedValueOnce(false); // the first retry
await expect(store.setM3uLocks('pl-1', [])).resolves.toBe(false);
// The persisted store may carry the removal: not readable.
expect(store.readable()).toBe(false);
expect(store.lockedGroupTitles('pl-1')).toEqual(['Adults']);
await expect(store.ensureReadable()).resolves.toBe(false);
await expect(store.ensureReadable()).resolves.toBe(true);
expect(storage.writeLocks).toHaveBeenLastCalledWith({
'pl-1': { xtream: [], stalker: [], m3u: ['Adults'] },
});
});
it('rolls back an Xtream removal when the app relocks during the index stamps', async () => {
await store.load();
await store.ensureReadable();
@@ -75,8 +75,14 @@ export class ParentalLockLockStore {
* same store and the later write would silently drop the earlier edit.
*/
private writeQueue: Promise<unknown> = Promise.resolve();
/** "Remove all playlists" could not clear the persisted store yet. */
private pendingClearAll = false;
/**
* The persisted store differs from the in-memory one and must be
* rewritten from it: "Remove all playlists" could not clear it, or a
* refused edit could not be reverted. Retried on the next store access;
* the store is not `readable` meanwhile, since a restart would load the
* persisted copy.
*/
private readonly pendingRewrite = signal(false);
private readonly staleIndex = new ParentalLockStaleIndex();
/** The persisted store could not be read; see `ensureReadable()`. */
@@ -93,6 +99,7 @@ export class ParentalLockLockStore {
() =>
this.loadedState() &&
!this.unreadable() &&
!this.pendingRewrite() &&
this.staleIndex.isEmpty()
);
/** Bumps whenever the lock set changes; consumers re-query. */
@@ -136,11 +143,8 @@ export class ParentalLockLockStore {
*/
async ensureReadable(): Promise<boolean> {
await this.load();
if (this.pendingClearAll) {
this.pendingClearAll = !(await this.storage.writeLocks({}));
if (this.pendingClearAll) {
return false;
}
if (this.pendingRewrite() && !(await this.rewritePersistedStore())) {
return false;
}
if (this.unreadable()) {
const locks = await this.storage.readLocks();
@@ -167,21 +171,9 @@ export class ParentalLockLockStore {
this.staleIndex.clear();
return;
}
const restamped: string[] = [];
for (const playlistId of this.staleIndex.ids()) {
try {
if (await this.stampXtreamLocks(playlistId)) {
restamped.push(playlistId);
}
} catch (error) {
console.error(
'Failed to reconcile the parental lock index.',
error
);
}
}
if (restamped.length > 0) {
this.staleIndex.unmark(...restamped);
if (
await this.staleIndex.reconcile((id) => this.stampXtreamLocks(id))
) {
this.revisionState.update((value) => value + 1);
}
}
@@ -333,8 +325,7 @@ export class ParentalLockLockStore {
this.unreadable.set(false);
this.staleIndex.clear();
this.revisionState.update((value) => value + 1);
this.pendingClearAll = !(await this.storage.writeLocks({}));
return !this.pendingClearAll;
return this.rewritePersistedStore();
});
}
@@ -351,6 +342,19 @@ export class ParentalLockLockStore {
);
}
/** Writes the in-memory store; a failure leaves `pendingRewrite` set. */
private async rewritePersistedStore(): Promise<boolean> {
const written = await this.storage.writeLocks(this.locks());
if (!written) {
console.error('The parental lock store could not be rewritten.');
}
if (written === this.pendingRewrite()) {
this.pendingRewrite.set(!written);
this.revisionState.update((value) => value + 1);
}
return written;
}
private enqueue<T>(task: () => Promise<T>): Promise<T> {
const run = this.writeQueue.then(task, task);
this.writeQueue = run.catch(() => undefined);
@@ -535,9 +539,7 @@ export class ParentalLockLockStore {
if (options.authorize && !options.authorize()) {
// Relocked while the write was in flight: the durable store goes
// back to the in-memory one, which still holds the lock.
if (!(await this.storage.writeLocks(this.locks()))) {
console.error('Failed to revert a refused parental lock edit.');
}
await this.rewritePersistedStore();
return false;
}
this.locks.set(next);
@@ -31,4 +31,30 @@ export class ParentalLockStaleIndex {
clear(): void {
this.unmark(...this.playlists);
}
/**
* Re-stamps every listed playlist through `stamp`; the ones that
* succeed leave the list. True when any did.
*/
async reconcile(
stamp: (playlistId: string) => Promise<boolean>
): Promise<boolean> {
const restamped: string[] = [];
for (const playlistId of this.ids()) {
try {
if (await stamp(playlistId)) {
restamped.push(playlistId);
}
} catch (error) {
console.error(
'Failed to reconcile the parental lock index.',
error
);
}
}
if (restamped.length > 0) {
this.unmark(...restamped);
}
return restamped.length > 0;
}
}