Files
iptvnator/docs/architecture
4grayandClaude Opus 5.5 af44e2368b ci(performance): give the initial-bytes ratchet slack and a labelled override (#1744)
* ci(performance): give the initial-bytes ratchet slack and a labelled override

The exact renderer.initialBytes counter failed PRs for reasons outside
their diff: two concurrent merges left master 108 bytes over the baseline
for hours, and bundler identifier renaming moves the counter by hundreds of
bytes. PRs growing it by 243 and 302 bytes had no way to pass at all,
because the direction check refuses any raised baseline.

- Counter entries accept `slack` (integer, entry unit): the ratchet enforces
  `value + slack`, reports how much slack a measurement uses, and still
  prints the tighten hint below `value`. renderer.initialBytes gets 4096
  bytes, so growth can accumulate at most 4 KiB past the last lowered
  baseline while regressions such as +35 KB still fail.
- check-baseline-direction.mjs compares `value + slack`, treats widened
  slack like a widened tolerance, and takes `--allow-increase`, which
  reports weakened entries as ALLOWED instead of failing.
- CI passes `--allow-increase` only when the pull request (or, for a master
  push, the pull request merged as the pushed commit) carries the
  perf-baseline-increase label, read from the API so a job re-run picks up
  a label added later.

This change widens the slack itself, so its own PR needs the label.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_0166PWobUjpoiWt8E9bBdsCs

* fix(performance): report slack usage only for entries that have slack

A wall-clock measurement above `value` but within `value × toleranceRatio`
fell into the slack branch and was reported as using "slack", conflating
timing tolerance with counter slack. Only entries with `slack` report it now.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_0166PWobUjpoiWt8E9bBdsCs

* fix(performance): scope the push-time label and refuse raised counter values

- A master push compares the whole push, but the label was read from the
  head commit's PR only, so one labelled PR could cover another commit's
  increase in the same push. The label now counts only when the push added
  exactly one first-parent commit (a squash or merge of one PR); any other
  push that weakens a baseline fails.
- Raising a counter's `value` while narrowing its `slack` lowered the
  enforced limit and was reported as "lowered". A counter's value is the
  measured evidence and only moves down, so that raise is now a weakening
  that needs the label.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_0166PWobUjpoiWt8E9bBdsCs

* fix(performance): treat a counter/wall-clock type switch as a weakening

Turning `{ value: 100, slack: 10 }` into `{ value: 105, toleranceRatio: 1 }`
skipped the raised-counter-value rule and was reported as a lowered limit.
Switching an entry between counter and wall-clock now needs the
perf-baseline-increase label.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_0166PWobUjpoiWt8E9bBdsCs

* ci(performance): paginate the label lookups of the direction check

The labels endpoint returns 30 entries per page by default, so a PR with
more labels could miss perf-baseline-increase. Both lookups now request
100 per page and paginate, like the release-note gate.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_0166PWobUjpoiWt8E9bBdsCs

---------

Co-authored-by: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-09-28 14:55:15 +02:00
..