* perf(web): make the app root and settings components OnPush
Plan item C6 step 3 for apps/web: the fifteen Eager components switch to
OnPush, among them the app root and the update notification panel that
the idle audit found re-rendering on every idle tick. Their template
state is signals from the settings facades, signal inputs and the shared
reactive settings form.
The checklist flagged the backup import, which patches the form from a
detached file input with no template event. A new spec patches only a
value, which changes no form status, and confirms the OnPush general
section still shows the new theme; it guards that path for the zoneless
flag.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
* fix(settings): re-render OnPush sections when the form changes outside them
Review follow-ups (Greptile, Codex):
- The settings sections read form values in their templates (selected
theme and cover size, epgField.value, form().value.player), and the
parent changes the form outside their events: Discard and backup import
patch it, the store hydrates it, the EPG file picker sets a control
after an await. Under OnPush the section kept the old selection or EPG
status. Each section now marks itself on its form's events
(markSectionForCheckOnFormEvents).
- The value-only patch test no longer forces detectChanges(); with the
fixture rendering on its own it fails without the marking, and so does
a new test for a control set outside the EPG section.
- The zoneless guard counts only changeDetection metadata outside
comments, so a comment naming the strategy is not an Eager component.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
* test(settings): guard the unsaved-changes bar after a save off the sections
Review follow-up (Codex): Save marks the form pristine after an async
store write, also on Backup, Reset or search, where no form section is
rendered. The OnPush page re-renders anyway because pristine and valid
read the form's state signals; the new test checks that on the Backup
page without forcing a render (it waits for the scheduled one).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
---------
Co-authored-by: 4gray <fourgray@proton.me>
Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
* perf(playback): make the web players and M3U player OnPush
Plan item C6 step 3 for playback: the eight Eager components in
libs/ui/playback (video.js, ArtPlayer, HTML5/hls/mpegts, audio player,
web player view, VOD details, sidebar, external-player dialog) and the M3U
video player and VOD detail switch to OnPush. The player libraries' events
already reach the UI through the signal-backed controls adapter or
outputs, and the players' DOM belongs to the libraries.
The M3U video player rendered three plain fields written outside template
events: the channel-number overlay, cleared by a 2 s debounce timer, and
the player choice, written from an IndexedDB read and a settings effect.
They are signals now, and a test checks that the overlay leaves the DOM
when the timer fires.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
* test(playback): let the overlay's signal write schedule its own render
Review follow-up (Greptile): the test forced a render with
fixture.detectChanges() after the debounce timer, so it would pass even
if the signal write stopped scheduling an OnPush render. It now runs the
fixture with autoDetectChanges and only advances the fake timers; with
plain fields under OnPush the overlay never renders and the test fails.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
---------
Co-authored-by: 4gray <fourgray@proton.me>
Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
* test(performance): skip every test-only file suffix in the zoneless guard
#1813 added serial-details.test-stubs.ts, whose stub components set
ChangeDetectionStrategy.Eager. The zoneless checklist guard listed only
some test-only suffixes, counted the stub file as production code and has
failed the performance-harness job on master since. It now skips every
`.spec` / `.test` file with or without a suffix, test-setup.ts and
test-stubs/ directories.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
* test(performance): accept multi-segment test-only suffixes in the zoneless guard
Review follow-up (Greptile): `(-\w+)?` allowed one suffix segment, so a
file such as `rail.test-data-stubs.ts` would be scanned as production.
The suffix now repeats, and a classifier test pins which names are
skipped and which ship.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
---------
Co-authored-by: 4gray <fourgray@proton.me>
Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
* docs(performance): inventory the zoneless change-detection migration
Plan item C6 step 2. docs/architecture/zoneless-migration.md lists the 66
production files (67 components) that still set
ChangeDetectionStrategy.Eager, the ten places where a template-read plain
field is written outside an Angular event, the NgZone and
ChangeDetectorRef calls to remove at the flip, and the IPC, player,
observer, timer and dialog paths checked as signal-safe.
On Angular 22 an unset changeDetection already means OnPush, so only the
explicit Eager components re-render on every tick.
zoneless-migration.spec.ts in the performance harness compares the
checklist with the code: a new Eager component, or a converted one left
unticked, fails it.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
* perf(ui): make the libs/ui Eager components OnPush
Plan item C6 step 3 for libs/ui/components and libs/ui/epg: eleven
components (twelve with the EPG trust dialog) set
ChangeDetectionStrategy.Eager and were checked on every tick, among them
the always-mounted EPG progress panel the idle audit found re-rendering
on every idle tick. Their template state is already signals, signal
inputs, immutable dialog data or fields written from template events, so
they switch to OnPush without other changes.
The epg-item-description spec mutated dialog data after creation and
marked only the fixture's host view; it now marks the component's own
view, which OnPush requires. The libs/ui playback and remote-control
components stay Eager for their own PRs.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
---------
Co-authored-by: 4gray <fourgray@proton.me>
Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
