"TiviMate for PC" is the query behind most of this page's traffic, so the
page now names the apps people mean instead of describing a category. What
it says about them is what could actually be verified: TiviMate's Google
Play listing (Android and Android TV, reads M3U, Xtream Codes and Stalker,
"a media player that provides no content"), and IPTV Smarters publishing
Windows and macOS builds — which is why the page does not claim TV apps
have no desktop version.
The useful half is the part no affiliate site writes: these names are
heavily abused, the stores carry copycat listings, and much of the search
result for any of them is someone selling "subscriptions" under the app's
brand. The developers are player authors who do not sell channels, which is
exactly what IPTVnator says about itself — the page links to our own
unofficial-websites post for the same reason.
Three FAQ entries answer the query directly, and the page joins the
NAMES_THIRD_PARTY_SOFTWARE set so the test requires its dated disclaimer.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Third page in the set, and the one that answers the question people ask
before installing anything: where should IPTV actually run. It compares the
two places rather than two products — everything that needs a keyboard
(adding a provider, attaching a guide, mapping a channel, working out why a
stream fails) against everything that needs a couch — and states plainly
that IPTVnator has no TV build, with the phone remote as the answer for a
laptop wired to the television.
No third-party software is named, so the page carries no ThirdPartyNote: the
rows describe the ordinary experience of each kind of device and say so in
the caption.
The compare hub's lead no longer claims every page is a choice inside the
app, and the three newest entries get distinct icons.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Second page under the third-party rules. Kodi is a media center that reaches
IPTV through a PVR add-on, so the comparison is about shape rather than
score: where the source comes in, what each program is built for, and the
platforms. The tables say plainly what Kodi does that IPTVnator does not —
a local library with scraped metadata, add-ons and skins, a remote-friendly
interface and builds for TV boxes and a Raspberry Pi — and the verdict tells
a reader already running Kodi on a TV to stay there.
Kodi's IPTV capabilities come from whichever PVR client is installed, so
rows that depend on one say "Depends on the add-on" instead of claiming
something this page cannot verify.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
First comparison page that names other software. It answers the question
every "IPTV on a computer" guide raises — VLC opens the playlist, so why a
dedicated player — with three tables (what each can connect to, what a
playlist file cannot carry, and the practical differences) and eight FAQ
entries, then ends where the honest answer is: IPTVnator hands VLC the
stream, with the playlist's headers and the resume position, and reads the
position back.
Naming another project brings rules, now recorded in the registry doc
comment and a new README section: a dated ThirdPartyNote stating the other
project is independent and endorses nothing, only stable publicly documented
facts, no claim of a missing feature that was not checked, and no logos,
brand styling or links to the other project. The compare test enforces the
note and the date for every page in its NAMES_THIRD_PARTY_SOFTWARE set.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Publish /compare/ with three pages answering the choices the app asks
users to make: M3U vs Xtream Codes vs Stalker portal, the built-in web
players vs embedded MPV vs external MPV/VLC, and the desktop app vs the
self-hosted browser version. Each opens with a one-paragraph verdict,
carries a feature matrix whose cells are yes, no or a qualifier, and
emits WebPage / FAQPage / BreadcrumbList JSON-LD — not
SoftwareApplication, because guidance is not a product listing.
These compare IPTVnator's own options against each other rather than
naming other products, so every cell is checkable against this
repository. Pages that name competitors remain phase 3's open half; the
plan now records what has to be decided first.
A registry in src/lib/comparisons.ts drives the hub, the switcher and
the tests. The header gains a Compare entry and the features hub links
across. tools/testing/website-compare-pages.test.mjs checks canonical
URLs, the verdict block, the table, schema, cross-links and sitemap
entries.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
